The
foreign secretary’s claim that migrants threaten our standard of living is the
epitome of Tory hypocrisy.
In recent months, it has been made almost impossible
for every man, woman and child living in the UK to have not been exposed to the
mainstream media’s rampant scaremongering of migrants coming into Britain.
Last week the foreign secretary, Philip Hammond,
claimed that millions of “marauding” African migrants pose a threat to the EU’s
standard of living and social structure. This should not be viewed as a
surprise, as the Conservatives are no stranger to deploying smoke and mirrors
propaganda. In the build up to the general election, Cameron and his peers served
up a cocktail of dodgy statistics, platitudes and fictitious promises. They
fermented the myth that Labour was to blame for the national deficit, with the
latter helplessly attempting to claw back voters with pro-austerity and tough
immigration promises. On the day of the election results, the Conservatives
were victorious and Labour lost the majority of their seats in Scotland to the
SNP, simultaneously sparking the resignation of leader Ed Miliband.
Now with a first Tory majority government in 23 years,
the Conservatives have begun introducing draconian laws which advertently
discriminate against the poor, ethnic minorities and the disabled. This is
precisely why the foreign secretary’s claim that migrants threaten our standard
of living is so ludicrous. It is not desperate families who have been uprooted
and forced to travel across continents in search of sanctuary that are ravaging
this country’s economy; it is the government this country voted in. And the
Conservatives are not simply just sweeping away the structure of society; they
are carefully disembowelling it, parcelling public sectors up and selling them
off to their corporate pals.
When migrants are described as invaders hell-bent on
plundering a foreign land, it is usually by the right-wing press intent on
scaremongering and stirring hostility. If this is not the case, there is a
tendency for it to be the opinion of the typical nationalistic/extreme-right
bigot, the kind of person who does not view refugees as a humanitarian concern,
but as garbage that is causing a smell. However, when they are described by a
member of the Tory cabinet in this manner, you ought to think he should know
better. And Mr Hammond does know better.
Of course he does, the man must have a certain degree of intelligence to have
landed himself such a high ranked place in government. Mr Hammond’s claims are
nothing more than him deploying a smoke-and-mirrors tactic; exploiting his
position to deceive the general cohort that refugees are to blame for this
country’s shortcomings, rather than the policies which his party are busy
implementing.
Since the election, Cameron and his cronies have
bombarded the public sector on all fronts. The Chancellor George Osborne has
slashed the welfare budget by £12 billion, cuts which statistics have already
shown will directly affect the poorest families in the UK. Just to rub salt in
the still bleeding wounds, the Chancellor announced the new “living wage” of £7.20
from next April, but this is restricted to people who are over 25. This is just
one in a string of new laws which attack young people, because apparently in
Osborne’s eyes the young are not of equal worth. The Home Secretary Theresa May
swiftly sunk her teeth into the proposed Snoopers’ Charter. The original
communications data bill was blocked by the former deputy prime minister Nick
Clegg, three years ago. However, since the election the Conservatives have been
working on revamping the bill.
The dystopian policy would strengthen the online
surveillance powers of the police and security services and under the law,
internet and mobile phone companies would be required to keep records of
customers’ browsing activity, social media use, emails, voice calls and text
messages for a year. Essentially, if this law is enforced life in the UK is
swiftly going to become a lot more Orwellian. The Home Secretary has also vowed
to ban all legal highs, which even her government advisors have called
“unenforceable”. The bill envelops so many substances, from tea to nasal spray,
that she might as well be passing a law that bans pleasure. The other most
notable MP who has been busy mutilating the lives of the disabled and poor is
the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, Iain Duncan Smith. Mr Duncan Smith has
hastily etched himself a portrait of being the pantomime villain of parliament,
materialising cuts which directly affect the most vulnerable in society.
It’s
the familiar case of the rich getting richer, and the poor getting poorer
You will have heard those words before but it couldn’t
be any further from the truth. The Chancellor’s raid on the welfare budget
includes a number of ideological, damaging measures that will certainly harm
the young and vulnerable. His main welfare announcements comprise of a “youth
obligation” for those aged 18-21, that says they must either earn or learn. He
has scrapped the automatic entitlement to housing benefit for 18-21 year olds,
which basically leaves anyone of that age who is unemployed and homeless
mercilessly abandoned. Mr Osborne has also halved the income threshold in tax
credits and sliced the benefit cap by £6000.
This may sound all well and good in “cutting the
deficit left by Labour” to their blue-knitted adherents, but to anyone with a
sense of realism austerity is nothing but a con. For this is not austerity;
it’s a transfer of assets from public to private ownership. One of the main
advantages of the word “austerity” to the Tories is that it implies a gradual
process and many of the apathetic in this country will still not know what it
means. This is why I can only presume the country has not yet erupted into a
full-scale revolution; if the majority of the inhabitants in the UK realised
what austerity really means and the bleak future it entails, then I have no
doubt the Houses of Parliament would be in flames before nightfall.
You may view this outcome as being overly dramatic, so
let’s look at the facts to see how divided wealth and equality really is. According
to new statistics, families in the UK hold a combined wealth of more than £9.1
trillion, the equivalent of £326,414 for every household in the land. Despite
average household wealth growing by more than £126,000 in just 10 years, the
richest 20 per cent hold an astounding 105 times more wealth than the poorest
fifth. When you consider that the average household in the UK earn £20,801,
these figures reveal a deeply divided Britain. To envisage the thought of every
home in the year gain over £300,000 may seem like a Trotskyist utopia. However,
when the national household income is £306,000 away from economic equilibrium for
everyone, you have to demand answers to why an emergency budget is required
which is undeniably going to widen the chasm between the rich and poor.
A prime example of this gulf in wealth and equality
was announced just a few days after the election. MP’s who were only elected a
few days before are set to receive a ten per cent pay rise within months, an
increase in pay from £67,060 to £74,000 a year. Considering David Cameron said
the proposed pay rise was “unacceptable” in 2013, one might be perplexed as to
why he has still to object to the notion. However, Cameron has instead chosen
to ramble on about the “swarms” of migrants at Calais, and rather than
protesting he is embracing the onslaught of injustice his government are
hurling at the people of this country and those attempting to enter it.
In the months following the election, the Chancellor
has also demonstrated the behemothic rift which separates the wealthy and the
poor. On the 8th July, the same day George Osborne was shelling out
£12 billion welfare cuts to the most destitute factions of society, his father
Sir Peter Osborne signed a deal worth £6 million with a property developer
based in an offshore tax haven. Osborne’s family business, Osborne &
Little, linked up with a corporation in the British Virgin Islands to turn its
former headquarters in an expensive south London district into flats and
houses. Once they had received planning permission for the site, Osborne &
Little sold the site to its foreigner partner for £6,088,000. There is a
certain degree of irony in the fact that, the same day the Chancellor was
announcing cuts that will potentially decimate the lives of hundreds of
thousands of people, his affluent multi-millionaire family was earning an extra
£6 million tax free. This is Tory hypocrisy at its finest.
Then again, considering the backgrounds of the UK’s
key political figures, it is hardly astonishing that they have very little clue
about how the average Briton lives. They neither know, nor care. Cameron and
Osborne, like many of their Tory peers, are the sons of multi-millionaires,
Eton educated and were members of the infamous Bullingdon Club. The Club where
members have to burn a £50 note in front of a beggar as part of an “initiation
ceremony”. That’s right, the man who has the most power in government and the
man in control of the national budget both once burnt a £50 note in front of
the most impoverished members of society.
Perhaps it shouldn’t be so surprising then, that the
Chancellor’s family have just evaded tax on a £6 million deal. After all, our
government cost the taxpayer a gargantuan £85 billion on corporate welfare in
2014 alone. If this has made you feel abhorred I cannot blame you; the Chancellor
has just stripped £12 billion from the welfare budget, in the name of “cutting
the deficit”, yet still squeezes £85 billion out of the taxpayer annually to
appease his megalomaniacal chums. If that wasn’t shameful enough, in April the
government also scrapped a £347 million crisis fund that provides emergency
cash for families on the verge of homelessness or starvation.
Since they regained government with a majority, the
Tories have been engrossed in meticulously packaging up pieces of the public sector
and auctioning them off to private firms and companies. In the build up to the
election, it was revealed that the Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt had signed a
deal worth £780 million, to sell fragments of the NHS off to 11 private firms. There
has not been any further developments since then, or at least as far as the
public is aware, but the future of the NHS looks bleak to say the least. In
June, the Chancellor continued the trend of selling off public assets, this
time the government’s remaining 30% share in Royal Mail, currently worth £1.5
billion. Osborne has since also kicked off the first round of sales in the
Royal Bank of Scotland at a loss of £1.1 billion to the taxpayer, attempting to
justify the sale with the preposterous response that “it is the right thing to
do for the taxpayer”. It really is amazing that so many people voted for this
nonsense.
With all these flash sales of government assets
without the public’s consent, you could almost be mistaken into thinking we
don’t live in a democracy anymore. However, if these authoritarian state of
affairs weren’t bad enough, David Cameron nominated a major Tory donor for the
House of Lords last week. Multi-millionaire banker James Lupton, who has given
£2.5 million to the Conservatives since 2009, is expected to be among the 30
new Tory peers, and has found his way there entirely un-elected. It appears the
Prime Minister is determined to stuff the already bloated Upper House with even
more wealthy bankers and uber-rich cronies, which will allow them to influence
parliamentary decisions and preserve his party while doing nothing for the weak
and vulnerable. One could come to the conclusion that in 21st
century politics, even the highest ranked politicians are nothing more than
marionettes to fat-cat bankers, put in place to serve the will of the
oligarchy.
Theresa
May is stamping her own brand of dystopia
The home secretary has been working hard imposing on
our human rights and standard of living. Election results were barely in when
the home secretary indicated the Tories will increase state surveillance
powers, much to the alarm of privacy campaigners and anyone else who doesn’t
want the UK to resemble 1984. The
proposed law, known as the Snoopers Charter’, was blocked by the Liberal
Democrats as part of the coalition agreement, but now they are gone the
nation’s privacy is at the mercy of this wannabe Thatcherite figure. The main
problem with the bill, other than your human right to privacy, is that it puts
too much power in the hands of Mrs May – rather than the decision being made by
a judge to look through people’s private messages.
Another highly unpopular law that the home secretary
has introduced is her bizarre and frankly farcical ban on legal highs. Her own
expert drug advisors have said that introducing the blanket ban risks “serious
unintended consequences”. The advisory council wrote to the home secretary
warning that her legislation risks handing out seven-year prison sentences to
the sellers of amiable or even helpful herbal medicines, and criminalising
otherwise law-abiding young people. The umbrella ban is highly unusual in
British law, as it brings in a complete ban on all psychoactive substances and
then introduces a list of exemptions for those in everyday use, such as alcohol
and coffee. The fact that the Conservatives’ own media flagship, The Telegraph, described the bill as “unnecessary,
incomprehensible and largely unenforceable” gives a pretty clear indication of
how mind-bendingly stupid the ban is. They also added that “by encouraging
professional criminals into a new area of business, it is likely to prove
entirely counterproductive”, which no doubt would be one of the consequences of
the ban.
Theresa May should take a leaf out of Portugal’s book;
the nation decided to decriminalise all drugs in 2001 and now hardly anyone
dies as a result of overdosing. Portugal decided to treat possession and use of
small quantities of these drugs as a public health issue, not a criminal one.
They are now reaping the awards, with the lowest number of drug overdose deaths
in the EU – there are a mere three drug related deaths per million citizens.
This is compared to the EU average of 17.3 per million and more alarmingly,
44.6 per million in the UK. However, rather than tackling the situation with
logic, Theresa May seems more concerned with incarcerating users of relatively
harmless substances such as nitrous oxide, and instead handing control of a
£200 billion trade to savage gangsters. Advanced nations around the world are
waking up to the failure of the war on drugs, while Britain’s drug policy is
still being dictated by right-wing scaremongers armed with disinformation.
The home secretary has also demonstrated a degree of
xenophobia in some of her recently introduced laws. She plans to ban
international students from working during their studies and then force them to
leave the UK once they have graduated. This has to be considered the most
egregious of her mandates, not just because it is entirely counterproductive,
but because it also reflects her own grotesque outlook on migrants. The obvious
problem this will have, other than the cultural damage it will necessitate, is
the £18 billion foreign students contribute to the UK each year. This is a
bemusing decision by the home secretary, not just because of the enormous
income the country will lose out on, but why on earth she would feel so
passionately about denying foreign students the right to work and then stay in
the UK. The only coherent reason for this must be that she possesses an
underlying streak of racism, that she believes this great nation which was
fabricated around immigrants, is now full to the brim. Either way, Mrs May has
clearly never been informed that nationalism and economic proficiency are not
compatible concepts.
This bigoted behaviour could have steered her to the
role of villain of Parliament, however that title is reserved for Iain Duncan
Smith. Nonetheless, the home secretary has continued her fanatical assault on
migrants. The government’s plan is to jail landlords who rent out homes to
illegal immigrants. This will sound like an attractive concept to the
neoliberalists, but it will have calamitous ramifications as racist landlords
will be allowed to flourish. This is part of the government’s knee-jerk
response to the “migrant crisis” unravelling in Calais, which as well as
harming undocumented people and needlessly punishing those who rent to them, it
will only help fuel discrimination among landlords and letting agents. It
doesn’t take much for state-sanctioned prejudice to become entrenched throughout
society and the hardships of austerity are breeding racism and fascism. All the
while, the perpetrators of this economic barrenness are quietly stirring their
cauldron of chicanery, cornering the immigration debate into the limelight so
no one questions their tyrannical decrees.
Iain
Duncan Smith would have been better suited as a member of Hitler’s SS
Iain Duncan Smith is probably the most malevolent
member of any government since the Emperor Nero. If he was actually held
accountable for the hundreds of people who have died as a result of having
their benefits cut or thrust into poverty, he would be viewed in the same light
as Kim Jong-Un. Yet it is only those on the “left” who consider the DWP
(Department for Work and Pensions) Secretary to be an appalling, cold-blooded
monster, which is quite extraordinary when you consider the devastating effects
that his punitive measures will and are having on millions of innocent people. Mr
Duncan Smith has sculpted this image by cutting disabled benefits by £30 a week
– because payments of up to £102.15 per week do not “incentivise” sick or
disabled people to find work. An increasing number of young people are being
made homeless after being financially crippled by the welfare reforms. Charity
and council agents have reported that homelessness among under 25’s who had
experienced benefit reductions has increased six fold in the space of a year,
from 1.7% of cases in 2013 to 10% in 2014.
These welfare cuts may not appear particularly
sinister at first glance, however, what they emanate is truly horrific. Some of
the most poor and vulnerable in society are literally dying as a direct result
of DWP sanctions. There’s not just a handful of cases; it's now been leaked that thousands of people have perished after being declared fit for work. Iain Duncan Smith had buried the figures that show how many people have died within six weeks of having their benefits stopped, but his murky secret has just been exposed. It proves that 2,380 people died between 2011 and 2014 as a direct result, a mind-boggling average of 90 people a month. This is a modern era genocide and all within the constraints of the law. In addition, the
Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is investigating the DWP over a
separate refusal to go public with its internal reviews into 49 specific deaths
of people on benefits. Reviews that, according to the government’s own internal
guidance, are triggered when suicide or alleged suicide is “associated with a
DWP activity”. These are not just “benefit scroungers” who have refused
to work, not that it would make their death any more acceptable, but the
disabled and the chronically ill.
Malcolm Burge was a
66-year-old retired gardener who had his housing benefit cut by 50%, but a backlog at Newham council meant he had
unknowingly continued to receive the higher amount. The council issued him a
demand for £809.79 and in one of several letters pleading for help he said; “I
have no savings or assets. I am not trying to live, I am trying to survive.” He
then drove to Cheddar Gorge in Somerset and set his car on fire. It is
difficult to find words to describe how chilling his last sentence is, but
cases like this are swiftly becoming an emblem of DWP policy. David Clapson’s
benefits had been stopped as a result of missing one meeting at the jobcentre.
He was diabetic, and without the £71.70 a week from his jobseeker’s allowance
he couldn’t afford to eat or put credit on his electricity card to keep the
fridge where he kept his insulin working. Three weeks later Clapson died from
diabetic ketoacidosis, caused by a severe lack of insulin. When he was found he
had no food in his stomach and there was a pile of CV’s next to his body.
It
is pretty incomprehensible that a government department in a so-called
democracy would just allow these atrocities to occur. For the secretary of that
department to then sweep them under the rug and pretend they never existed, he
is surely no better than the evil terror organisations we are told to hate on
the news every day. They both have a blatant disregard for innocent lives, so
what is the difference? In the David Clapson case, the DWP knew he was diabetic
and therefore needed a good diet and insulin, which needed to be kept in a
working fridge. So when he starved and couldn’t afford the electricity to
preserve his medicine which resulted in the death, then surely the DWP are
answerable to a minimum charge of corporate manslaughter. We are fervently
hounded by the media about a “migrant crisis”; the truth is this is silently
turning into a widespread crisis, right under our noses. More than a million
people in this country have had their benefits stopped over the past year.
Sanctions against chronically ill and disabled people have risen by 580% in a
year. This is a system out of control and it is methodically killing off the
most poor and vulnerable.
Another
demonstration of the utter lack of compassion the Tories have for the poor is
the DWP’s refusal to count
serious mental health conditions amongst their criteria to protect vulnerable
people on benefits. Under
Tory logic, if you have depression, anxiety or OCD you chose it as a lifestyle,
just like you chose to be poor. The DWP has said that it only includes physical disabilities as making a person “vulnerable”.
Having a mental health condition, no matter how serious, does not count. It is
estimated that around 23 per cent of people on Job Seekers Allowance suffer
from a mental health condition. You do not need a doctorate in economics to
grasp that stopping their money is going to stop them from living. Iain Duncan
Smith is probably one of the few people alive who, when seeing a person in the
depths of despair or on the brink of suicide, instead of offering them help he
simply says tough luck. It is scarcely believable that this heinous figure is
effectively in control of whether the most vulnerable in society live or die.
The DWP Secretary is
infatuated with choking everyone in society, especially those under 25, into
work. It is this obsession that has led to some opprobrious proposals being
suggested in recent months. He and Cameron have concocted a plan to force young
people to work for their benefits, which would see them working 30 hours a week
for a fraction of the minimum wage. The proposals would put young adults who
have been out of work, education or training for six months into mandatory
community work. The Jobseekers’ Allowance would be
abolished for 18 to 21-year-olds and replaced with the “Youth Allowance” of the
same amount - £57.35 a week, or £1.91 per hour of work. The followers of Tory
tribalism will no doubt say this an equitable proposal, as will the
economically illiterate, who are unable to see the negative consequences of
these schemes and instead buy into the simplistic narrative that people without
jobs should be made to “do something”.
However, this “Youth Allowance” scheme carries a
pernicious underbelly; a Trojan horse strategy that Cameron and co naively
believe will be gobbled up by the masses and the unemployed turned upon. For
their delusionary plan is already punctured with enormous holes. There is
already over 150,000 18 to 21-year-olds on JSA and it has been announced they
will have to undertake community service, work which 200,000 people are already
sentenced to carry out each year by the courts. Basic mathematics will tell you
not all of these people can be forced to do community work when there is simply
not enough, so at some point the government is going to cut into people’s full
time jobs to meet these ‘needs’. What will happen when they eventually take
this stride? Regular working people are going to be made redundant to pave the
way for compulsory community work, and then are instantaneously going to find
themselves on benefits. At this stage, with unemployment surging on an
unprecedented scale, the Tory hierarchy will predictably update the law so that
anyone out of work for more than six months is cornered into the community work
scheme. In the blink of an eye, huge swathes of the population will be forced
to work for a fraction of their former wage and condemned to a life of
contemporary slavery, if you don’t consider that to have already happened. In
essence, Cameron and his minions will have obliterated the minimum wage and all
within the powers of the law.
Surely this is a plot too wicked ever to be conceived
you will say. But if you look at the mounting evidence with both eyes open,
ideological austerity is not just thawing the bedrock of society; it is rapidly
disintegrating into ash from within. Benefits and tax credits have already been
decimated, simultaneously seeing taxes rise for the poor, and the number of
food banks have soared from 56 in 2010 to 445 in 2015 – an unfathomable
increase of almost 700% in just five years. However, if the wheels of the
“Youth Allowance” bill start to roll, it will be a real game-changer as it will
open the floodgates for the Tories to begin shelling us with even more
repressive laws. Paul Mason recently argued in an article for The Guardian that; “Austerity means
driving the wages, social wages and living standards in the west down for
decades until they meet those of the middle class in China and India on the way
up”. This is an eerie but meticulous forecast of what the future will hold if
the Tories rule for the years to come, as it is difficult to comprehend what
else they are striving to achieve with these draconian mandates. David Cameron
said the “Youth Allowance” will “effectively abolish long-term youth
unemployment”; he is correct in the sense that the younger and eventually older
generations will be ‘employed’, however, that employment will be nothing more
than eternal thraldom to the state.
Poverty, and in particular child poverty, has been
spiralling since the Tories regained Parliament five years ago. Over the last
two years, excessive welfare cuts have reduced incomes for the poorest, and
drove 760,000 below the breadline. New Policy Institute (NPI) figures reveal
that 300,000 youngsters have been thrust into hardship, the biggest increase,
and the figures also estimate that 29% of UK children are in poverty after
hardship costs. So what has Iain Duncan Smith done to tackle this escalating
problem? I wish I could say nothing at all, but the answer is far more
monstrous. The DWP Secretary has decided the most logical course of action to
take is to change the way child poverty is measured, coincidentally being
declared just a few days before the budget and tax credits being slashed. Child poverty will no
longer be defined as 60% of the average income but through a series of indicators,
including exam results and whether parents are in work. Mr Duncan Smith said
the new system would make a “meaningful change to children’s life chances”. If
his statement sounds almost too ludicrous to believe, that’s because it is. In
his twisted imagination, “meaningful change” must mean plunging hundreds of
thousands of children into a pre-Industrial Era existence.
He
has also tried to sepulchre the suffering of the poor by claiming the solution to
zero-hour contracts is to rebrand them. The contracts, which do not guarantee
any hours of work for an employee, are exploiting 1.4 million people and are a glaring
cause of poverty. However, in classic distasteful fashion, Mr Duncan Smith has
said they should be rebranded as “flexible-hours contracts”. Only their
dyed-in-the-wool supporters will be gullible enough to believe this is a
plausible idea; the DWP Secretary is attempting to construct a vacuum, for
which the poverty-stricken will be swallowed up and condemned to myth by
society. Last week it was divulged that he was already forging this myth; a leaflet
produced by the DWP was hastily withdrawn after it emerged that it contained
fabricated quotations from fictitious people, supposedly taking about their
positive experiences of the welfare system. The fact that in the real
world claimants have been driven to suicide by sanctions makes the invention
particularly grotesque. For this is a man who inexplicably cheered and
applauded when the budget was declared, visibly excited by the prospect of piling
misery upon the poor. Perhaps in the next five years the DWP will make ‘Arbeit
Macht Frei’ its slogan, and Mr Duncan Smith will announce his malignant decrees
in a cap emblazoned with a skull and crossbones.
Your Prime Minister is the
real extremist
This
carousel of crooks would not be complete without discussing the master-at-arms,
the protector of the realm, your Prime Minister David Cameron. An article on
how the Tories are threatening our standard of living would also not be complete
without mentioning TTIP. If you are not yet familiar with this acronym it is
likely you soon will be. The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership is
a proposed trade agreement and the subject of an ongoing series of negotiations
between the EU and the US, which will essentially become the biggest trade deal
in history. This is not solely the work of Cameron of course, however, he and
his government are heavily involved with the negotiations. TTIP may sound
boring but this deal could quietly change your life, as it has the potential to
affect everything from your income to the food you eat and the state of the
NHS. Many people are still unaware of its existence but you need to learn about
it, as it will undeniably affect hundreds of millions of people.
The
primary threat of TTIP is that it will hand over European nations’ sovereignty
to corporations, this threat being made all the more suspicious by the talks
being held largely in secret and the fact that it has received very little
media coverage. Concerns are mounting that TTIP could lead to more
privatisation, with the prospect of US corporations providing vital UK public
services such as transport, education, water and health. These concerns should
be turning to panic if most people knew what has happened in Romania. When it dared to halt the production of a
gold mine, the government of Romania found itself facing a massive lawsuit from
a corporate mining giant in a secret "court". The case didn’t
make any sense; even though the corporation Gabriel Resources had claimed it spent
$500 million on the project, the CEO said it was seeking up to $4 billion in “compensation”,
which is half of Romania’s annual public healthcare budget.
What
happened in Romania is a terrifying sign of things to come if TTIP is passed,
as it is exactly the kind of case which TTIP would promote throughout Europe. US corporations would be allowed to sue EU
member states and all EU corporations to sue the US government. Despite
all of this, the British government has disturbingly fully signed up to the
corporate courts. Last year it signed a letter that made clear that the secret court
system shouldn’t be removed from the trade deal under any circumstances.
If this still doesn’t worry you, one of the main aims of TTIP is to open up
Europe’s public health, education and water services to US companies. This
could essentially mean the privatisation of the NHS. The EU has admitted that
TTIP will probably cause unemployment as jobs switch to the US, where labour
standards and trade union rights are lower. It has even advised EU members to
draw on European support funds to compensate for the expected unemployment.
However, the gravest threat to society that TTIP poses is its inherent assault
on democracy. One of the main aims is the introduction of Investor-State
Dispute Settlements (ISDS), which allow companies to sue governments if those
governments’ policies cause a loss of profits. In effect it means unelected
transnational corporations can dictate the policies of democratically elected
governments. This trade partnership has the potential risk of
eradicating society and our standard of living, I cannot stress enough the need
to educate yourself as it will not be fed on a spoon.
The Islamophobic
fanfare has been omnipresent throughout the western world and it is only
becoming more rambunctious. The relentless hostility from the media has become
the norm, in a time when the press is fabricated by neoconservatism and
scaremongering. However, David Cameron’s “counter-extremism” bill announced in
the Queen’s speech is going to hurl the anti-Muslim clampdown into precarious
territory. Prior to the speech, Cameron had already accused British Muslims of “quietly
condoning” the sectarian brutality of ISIS, a heedless statement which by
scapegoating Muslims will only fuel home-grown radicalisation further. He has
since said that the police, schools, mosques, broadcasters, prisons and parents
all need to do more to defeat extremism – almost everyone except the government
themselves. Rather than stepping back to consider Britain’s role in fomenting
terrorism at home and abroad, such as Britain’s recent history of consistently
bombing Muslim countries, he has chosen to spark a state-sponsored witch hunt
of Muslims living in the UK.
The “counter-extremism”
bill will criminalise and target Muslims with every arm of the state and
private sector; from nursery schools to
optometrists, health services to universities, all are now legally obliged to
monitor students and patients for any sign of “extremism” or “radicalisation”.
Furthermore, his scheme includes physical restriction orders for non-violent
individuals deemed “harmful”, powers to close mosques and vetting controls on
broadcasters accused of airing extremist material. He also issued
banning orders for non-violent individuals and organisations whose politics are
considered unacceptable. The latter is particularly troubling because it
envelops any ideologies that differ from the Tories; Cameron in in essence
quashing free speech.
His strategy is made even more stupendous by
defending the new powers in the name of “British values”, including “individual
liberty” and “mutual respect and tolerance”. I have little doubt that these
anti-extremism laws will be used predominantly against Muslims, however, it is
also clear they will not be implemented against certain extreme political
factions. National Action, a neo-Nazi group which has recently reared its ugly
head on the political stage, has held two ‘White Man March’ demonstrations this
year. Their politics should be considered unacceptable by anyone with an iota
of sanity, yet it was antifascist counter demonstrations, not the law, that
prevented them from marching on both occasions. It is also doubtful to say the
least that these homophobes and racists have any interest in mutual respect and
tolerance.
Cameron’s grand design
is destined to fail because his government refuses to believe extremist
violence is planted by injustice, grievances or its own policies. Britain has
staged multiple invasions and occupations of Muslim states, as well as
supporting dictatorships across the Muslim and Arab world. These include Saudi
Arabia, of course, which shares much of ISIS’ ideology and practises; and
Egypt, whose leader, Abdel Fatah al-Sisi,
overthrew the elected president in 2013 and is soon to be welcomed to Downing
Street. There were no terror attacks
before the US and Britain invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, and the perpetrators of
every terror attack or plot have used Western intervention in the Muslim world
for justification. For a few young beguiled western Muslims, groups like ISIS
offer a welcomed illusion of a fight against tyranny.
Cameron has launched
a fully-fledged assault on the basic liberties of British Muslims and with the
aid of his media allies, his toxic rhetoric is spreading like wildfire. The
current immigration debate, fuelled by the fact that many migrants are Muslims
and the impact of ISIS in the Middle East, has created an erroneous pandemonium;
far-right factions are sprouting up everywhere in the false belief that terror
is on the doorstep. Noam Chomsky once said that, “As long as the general
population is passive, apathetic, diverted to consumerism or hatred of the
vulnerable, then the powerful can do as they please”. Cameron and his allies
are speeding up the process by pouring coal onto that burning hatred. The West
spawned a monster in ISIS and now they are punishing the followers of that
faith. This government has set out to ravage the civil liberties of Muslims
living in the UK, next in the firing line will be anyone who opposes Tory ‘ideology’. The
first chapter of Britain's descent into a police state has begun, in the name
of "counter-terrorism" which has been augmented and exasperated since
day one.
It is these ‘anti-terror’ laws
that have compelled your Prime Minister to proclaim one of the most lurid
sentences by a state leader; “For too long we have been a passively tolerant society,
saying to our citizens so long as you obey the law we will leave you alone”. It
sounds like an extract from a speech made by a macabre ruler in an Aldous
Huxley novel, so what could Cameron possibly mean by this? Frankie Boyle came to
the denouement that the Prime Minister is an evil genius in an article he wrote
for The Guardian, stating that he has
“successfully pursued an agenda more radical than Thatcher’s – and has managed
it without anybody being terribly worried about him”. It would be tough to
disagree with him, as his scheme is so far to the right it would concede
Britain First’s Paul Golding to the centre ground. He supported his claim with
the tenuous response; “It's
often meant we have stood neutral between different values. And that's helped
foster a narrative of extremism and grievance.” This is even more
bemusing as to why only those on the left are initially perturbed by him, as he
might as well be saying, “We directly cause extremism, so to tackle it we’re
going to hound your life and civil rights as well”.
Make
no mistake, Cameron’s announcement is as simple as it sounds; obeying the law
will no longer be enough to ensure you avoid retribution by the state. Even if
you are not suspected of committing any crime, you could be struck by orders preventing
you from speaking in public or associating with certain individuals. This
coupled with the proposed Snoopers’ Charter, will legally permit the police to
plague your private life, even if you’re not even suspected of wrongdoing. The
term ‘Orwellian’ is often overused but this is no longer a cliché; his novels
are becoming a manuscript and a mould for this Tory government. We already have
numerous laws which allow police and counter-terrorism officers to monitor and
arrest anybody suspected of being in terrorism, so what is the purpose of this
new bill?
These
fundamental changes are being brought under the guise of combating terrorism,
but they have the potential to be deployed against anyone. As Cameron outlined,
the new mandates will be used against Islamic extremism on home soil, which
will inherently strip Muslims of their civil liberties. However, his harrowing
statement admitting the government will begin interfering with people’s lives
insinuates it won’t just be Muslim extremists, but any of his political
opponents (there is plenty of them) and anyone else who tries to obstruct his
route to establishing a totalitarian state. It’s all beginning to sound a lot
like what occurred in a particular European state in the 1930’s. If you thought
Britain’s future couldn’t be any more ghastly, the PM and Theresa May have even
suggested introducing a ‘thought crime’ element to the Snooper’s Charter, which
would have Orwell violently spinning in his grave.
In
the Western world, you are vigorously pressed by your politicians and all
sectors of the media into believing that there is a greater threat out there.
They would have you surmise that terrorist groups, who are to blame for as many
deaths as bee stings since 9/11, are going to crush your democracy and ‘free
speech’. If not them, it’s the “swarms” of “marauding” migrants; people who are
fleeing their annihilated homelands in search of sanctuary, after they were
ravaged by a terrorist organisation that was fabricated by the west in the
first place. Your government would have you assume the greatest threat is from
anyone but them and many of the passive and apathetic soak up their hollow
propaganda. However, the Chancellor is selling off public assets en masse and
creating the largest class division this country will have ever seen, and the
home secretary is introducing a law that will allow the government to spy on
everyone. The work and pensions secretary is systematically killing off the
poor and disabled and your Prime Minister is targeting and criminalising
innocent civilians. If these criminals continue their vandalism for another
five years our society will be falling to its knees. It might be then when the
populace rises from their slumber and realise that it is only our government which
threatens our standard of living.